Vanderpump Rules

Katie Maloney Lashes Out At ‘Ding Dong’ Rachel Leviss

Vanderpump Rules star Katie Maloney is lashing out at show alum, “ding dong” Rachel Leviss after comments she recently made. Katie went up against Rachel in Season 10 and had a bad feeling about her for some time. Now, she is letting her know, once again, where she stands. Keep reading to see what Katie had to say after all of this time.

Katie Maloney Lashes Out At ‘Ding Dong’ Rachel Leviss

In Season 10 of Vanderpump Rules, Katie Maloney and Tom Schwartz were dealing with their divorce. The one rule that they made was they could not date anyone in the friend group. Yet, Scheana Shay pushed Schwartz and Rachel Leviss together and they ended up smooching in Mexico. It was Scheana’s wedding to Brock Davies and after, Rachel was overly assertive toward Katie. That caused Katie to try and put Rachel in herself yet the clues were there she was having an affair with Tom Sandoval. After the Season 10 reunion and ‘Scandoval,’ Rachel checked herself into a mental health facility. She also did not return for Season 11.

Rachel Leviss-Instagram
Rachel Leviss-Instagram

However, once she was released, she did not stay out of the spotlight long. Rachel went on Bethenny Frankel’s Just B podcast before starting her own, Rachel Goes Rogue. She spends all of her time talking about Vanderpump Rules, the cast, what she was cheated out of, and more. Now, she has said that she misses but feels betrayed by some of her friends on the show. This shocked Katie to the core after how she claimed Scheana and Ariana were not even her real friends. More so, she alleged they were not that close which both ladies disputed.

According to Reality Blurb!, Katie Maloney did not hold back on the latest episode of her Disrespecfully podcast. She co-hosts it with Season 8 alum Dayna Kathan, who referred to Rachel as “a ding dong.” Katie responded:

“[Raquel is] moving the goalpost once again. I kind of have to chuckle at it because it’s just like – I don’t know what she’s trying to accomplish. If anyone was gonna pick up the phone, it was gonna be Scheana [Shay].”

She felt Schean was a true friend to Rachel but that all changed when a restraining order was filed. Katie then pointed out where Rachel keeps going wrong:

“You’re suing everybody. You’re suing Ariana because you f**ked her boyfriend in her home while she was away at a funeral. You’re suing her because she, like, happened to see s**t on his phone … You need to get your f**king head checked. Like the s**t that you put everyone through, the s**t you pulled with me, the vile f**king s**t you said to me. The way you made me feel when I looked in your f**king face and told you, and now you want to come say this. Log off. Get off the f**king internet. Go just, like, go open a pilates studio, find a nice man — anyone that’ll f**king date you — and have a nice simple life. No one wants to f**king talk to you with the s**t that you’re doing.”

 

Rachel Is On Everyone’s Nerves

Initially, some people were supportive of Rachel Leviss when she was trying to stay lowkey. However, the moment she was throwing everyone under the bus, that all changed. After hearing what Katie Maloney had to say, followers were completely done with Rachel and her antics:

  • I agree… Rachel is not the victim, she knew exactly what she was doing… they have names for people like her
  • Sociopathic ‘lawsuit happy freak’
  • Why is she still talking? And why are they interviewing her?
  • Finally someone called it what it is. She’s a loser that needs her head checked. 👏👏Katie.

Some wished Katie did not use as many expletives when getting her point across. Still, they believed it was time to give up Rachel because she was nothing but toxic. What do you think of what Rachel had to say? More so, do you believe that she misses her old life now that she just has the podcast? Finally, do you agree with Katie? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Related Articles

Back to top button
error: Content is protected !!

Adblock Detected

DISABLE ADBLOCK TO VIEW THIS CONTENT